First off, I wanted to clear up any misconceptions about my perspective on Medtronic's Guardian RT continuous glucose monitoring system versus the DexCom. Many of you came away from my first post with the impression that I prefer the DexCom (Seven). Not true. So far I'm finding the Guardian easier to use and more accurate than the Dex. A few details to elaborate:


* I find the Guardian much less fussy to wear and use. Actually, the sensors on both systems are pretty small and comfortable. But as noted, calibration on the Guardian does NOT require hooking up the unit to a particular traditional meter. DexCom is slated to do away with that requirement in its next version, but for now, you're stuck switching to the OneTouch and hooking the two up via cable at least four times a day.

The compact size of the Guardian receiver and built-in belt clip make it easy to wear on your person as well. The DexCom's carrier was always floppy, so I ended up sticking the unit in my purse most of the time, which meant I was always walking out of range and disrupting the transmission between the sensor and receiver. The alarms are much softer and less intrusive on the Guardian, too. That was a major issue for me personally -- and my husband, when the darn thing was beeping like a semi truck in our bedroom all night long. And have I mentioned batteries? The DexCom has to be plugged into the wall like a cell phone for charging, which of course interrupts your usage. The Guardian, on the other hand, just requires a quick AA battery switch.

* I'm also finding the accuracy with the Guardian to be much more consistent. Yes, it still misses some highs and lows in "real-time," but it's not so wildly off-target that I'm ready to toss it out the window, which was often the case with my Dex. I have learned that some of this may have had something to do with my calibration skills (see below). In addition, the Guardian receiver offers much more data you can use. For example, you can actually scroll through your individual glucose readings over the last 5 hours. And you see 3, 6, 12 and 24-hour views, versus only 1, 3, and 9-hour views with the DexCom. As noted earlier, you can also input carb counts and insulin doses on the Guardian for detailed record-keeping.

On top of all this, the Medtronic rep spent a good deal of time explaining calibration to me. I thought I knew it all, but being reminded about the 10-20 minute lag time between plasma blood (at your fingertips) and interstitial fluid was actually enlightening. The rep reminded me also how important it is to calibrate ONLY when your glucose levels are stable, otherwise you're just setting up the CGM system for inaccuracy.

Author and nutrition expert Hope Warshaw has written an excellent article in Diabetic Living magazine called (ah-ha!) "Ready for Prime Time? Continuous Glucose Monitoring." She provides a refreshingly realistic overview of the ups and downs of using this new technology. See her "Terms to Know" for some straightforward lessons on calibration, interstitial fluid, lag time, and warm-up time. Great info!

Hope's sage advice:

"When you start using your CGM, take it slow and be patient. Use the numbers as a way to keep track of trends rather than as a signal to enact an immediate response. Focus on fixing one problem at a time and don't let yourself get overwhelmed. Be realistic in your expectations. Continuous glucose monitoring won't produce perfect glucose control, and it doesn't remove the daily challenges you face in managing your diabetes."

Amen. Thank you, Hope.

Disclaimer: Content created by the Diabetes Mine team. For more details click here.


This content is created for Diabetes Mine, a consumer health blog focused on the diabetes community. The content is not medically reviewed and doesn't adhere to Healthline's editorial guidelines. For more information about Healthline's partnership with Diabetes Mine, please click here.