We learn more about the Climategate issue and emails from commentator Rex Murphy, and if he thinks this development justifies climate change skepticism.
Read the full transcript »
Rex Murphy on Climategate Alex: ClimateGate is the most recent scandal in the environmental debate. Hi, I’m Alex and welcome to watch mojo.com. We sat down with political commentator Rex Murphy to get his take on its relevance. So give our viewers some contacts, can you explain what exactly is Climate Gate? Rex Murphy: Oh what ClimateGate is the most recent carnage in the algorithm refers to either the hacking or whistle-blowing leak from the CRU Institute of Stanley which is one of the most prestigious feeding institutions to the UN IPCC finally international panel on climate change? Your World: “Well ClimateGate right now crossing down and now claiming its first victims in the United Kingdom, atop side just caught up and the scandal stepping down. Rex Murphy: And then we learned that the original raw data, the temperature readings is said that they collected over the last 150 years. It was imply announced for a very reason that they’ve been lost. The British meteorological office as announced that they will now set out an effort to reconstitute the raw data in which all of these projections are—even though it’s going to be, a three- year enterprise. And all draft in that two points. One, is that it doesn’t invalidate at all the possible scenarios that are been paying about global warming over the next century. But it certainly tells you that the atmosphere of Science which we will assume to be antiseptic disinterested, neutralized and humbled before the facts. And that’s our kind of romantic image of science that will not stand up. And secondly, I think it’s conceived by the largest issue that’s facing the entire world. The next hundred years on how we get out energy. That it has become a kind of strange marriage between what we used to call pure science and advocacy. And when advocacy goes to bed with science, the product was not to attract. Alex: So what of these emails represent to you? Rex Murphy: Content of these emails produce at least from the CRU, the East administration. This attempts to kind of bully opinions that are off side, attempts to please the pre review journals. Your World: Would they shelve it, bury it, hide it, lie about it, what? Rex Murphy: They try to make sure that it never saw the light of the day. Alex: Does it justify climate change skepticism? Rex Murphy: I think in journalism and in science, if you abandon skepticism, you’ve abandoned the principles of both professions. The only thing that maintains science is the clash of honest. And I’ll stress to this, honest and disinterested. The scientist does not going out to establish a policy, its not going to kind of give us a new reading of how we should organize the world. But on the political edge of it, you have people like Mr. Gohr who is a politician, who is prescribing policies and he’s attempting to finesse the policies under the umbrella of science. That’s a bad mix.