![]() |
Anthracyclines in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Therapy: Survival Benefits
|
![]() |
Anthracyclines for Breast Cancer: Does Stage Matter?
|
![]() |
A Good Doctor-Patient Relationship in Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
Breast Cancer Trials: How Have They Changed Breast Cancer Therapy?
|
![]() |
Advice To Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
A New Voice in Breast Cancer Activism: Soraya's Story
|
![]() |
Living with Breast Cancer Treatments: Personal Stories
|
![]() |
Understanding the Stages of Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
Using Aromatase Inhibitors in Early Stage Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
What is Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer?
|
![]() |
Hormone Replacement Therapy vs. Hormonal Treatment: What's the Difference?
|
![]() |
Understanding Hormonal Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
Talking to Your Doctor About Early-Stage Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
The Pros and Cons of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy
|
![]() |
Breast Cancer Genetics
|
![]() |
Hormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer: Assessing Benefits and Side Effects
|
![]() |
Breast Cancer: What is Your Risk?
|
![]() |
How to Succeed With Breast Cancer Adjuvant Therapy
|
![]() |
Hormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer: New Options
|
![]() |
New Technologies in Breast Cancer: Breast Ultrasound
|
![]() |
Bone Complications in Breast Cancer
|
![]() |
Interpreting Mammograms
|
![]() |
Which Adjuvant Therapy is Right for Your Breast Cancer?
|
![]() |
Preventing Breast Cancer Recurrence: What's Right for Me?
|
![]() |
Technologies in Breast Cancer: Breast MRI
|
![]() |
Technologies in Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography
|
![]() |
Breast Cancer Detection
|
![]() |
Preparing For Side Effects: What to Expect From Breast Cancer Therapies
|
![]() |
Technologies in Breast Cancer: Positron Emission Tomography
|
![]() |
Hormonal Therapy for Breast Cancer: Current Issues
|
|
|
, Cathy Conley , Terry P. Mamounas MD, Joyce O'Shaughne MD, Kathleen I. Pritchard MD, Hope S. Rugo MD
Anthracycline-based therapy is often recommended following surgery for breast cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence. This strategy has proved superior to non-anthracycline regimens but there's always room for improvement. Experts who attended the recent San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium discussed new regimens under investigation. Join some of these experts as they talk about some of the advances in anthracycline-treatment regimens.
CATHY CONLEY: Hi, I'm Cathy Conley, here at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, where an important topic has been improving the safety and efficacy of current breast cancer therapies. I had a chance to sit down with some of the experts to discuss issues surrounding a popular class of drugs called anthracyclines.
JOYCE O'SHAUGHNESSY, MD: It's pretty clear now that anthracycline-based therapy, called adjuvant chemotherapy, after the primary tumor has been removed, is where you're going to get your greatest survival advantages, to cure the most number of women. So that's why we use the anthracycline chemotherapy regimens.
TERRY P. MAMOUNAS, MD: There's very convincing evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy in general will improve survival, and certainly that's including evidence that anthracycline-containing therapy is actually more effective than non-anthracycline-containing therapy.
CATHY CONLEY: The benefits of anthracyclines include longer survival and longer time to remission. But what about the differences between the anthracyclines epirubicin and doxorubicin?
JOYCE O'SHAUGHNESSY, MD: They are both used for women where the primary breast cancer has been removed, and they have just been incorporated into different regimens. One is called CAF, and the other one is called CEF. You can see that the only difference there is whether you're using the adriamycin or the epirubicin, adriamycin, or Ellence -- the other name for epirubicin. But they are both used -- you don't use them together. You use them as part of combination chemotherapy, because we do know, also, from clinical trials that combinations of chemotherapy cure more women than just using one agent by itself.
TERRY P. MAMOUNAS, MD: Although those two anthracyclines are very similar in structure, minor differences in structure result in certain differences in the pharmacology in terms of uptake of the drug and metabolism of the drug. As a result of that, there are some differences in clinical endpoints. Certainly, there are differences in toxicity, particularly cardiotoxicity. So if you compare the two anthracyclines milligram per milligram, epirubicin is less cardiotoxic than doxorubicin.
As a result, epirubicin has been able to be intensified in higher doses of anthracycline, and several studies have shown that by increasing the dose of epirubicin, one can get actually an increase in benefit as compared to the other anthracyclines, adriamycin or doxorubicin, which actually we haven't been able to show and differences by intensifying its dose.
KATHLEEN PRITCHARD, MD: I think the biggest window of difference is for the cardiac effects, where you can give almost twice as much, milligram per milligram, epirubicin as you can adriamycin before seeing the same kind of cardiac problems.
CATHY CONLEY: At this meeting, a lot of attention has been placed on hormonal therapy and targeted therapy. But how are these advances impacting the use of anthracyclines in the adjuvant setting?
TERRY P. MAMOUNAS, MD: Advances in hormonal therapy don't necessarily make much difference in terms of the use or nonuse of anthracycline-containing regimens or other adjuvant chemotherapy.
There are some examples, though, of targeted therapy -- for example, Herceptin comes to mind -- where it's very difficult to give Herceptin with an anthracycline-containing regimen because of increased cardiotoxicity. So from that standpoint, as we advance the use of Herceptin in the adjuvant setting, we'll have to make some decisions in terms of how to use it relative to the anthracycline-containing regimens.