Classification of teeth refers to the position of the first molars, and how they bite together.
In 1844 J.F. Cravens, a dentist from Indianapolis, discussed the first dental deformities. He studied the first molar biting relationship and how the molars should line up with each other on the upper and lower jaws. Cravens called the first molar the "patriarch of the mouth," meaning the first molar determined the bite relationship for the entire mouth. J.N. Farrar, a leading dentist, in 1880 discussed the teeth relationship as an irregularity in his book "A Treatise on the Irregularities of the Teeth and Their Corrections."
In 1905 at the 4th Annual Meeting of American Society of Orthodontics the subject was again broached, but this time by Edward H. Angle, a dentist who dis- agreed with the other leading dentists and their terms and names of bite relationships. Angle had devised a simple and logical classification system for the teeth irregularities and deformities, which he didn't believe were irregularities or deformities at all, but rather malocclusions. He felt the first molar was "king of the mouth" and the basis for the classification of malocclusion of the teeth. Angle had studied Cravens's work and knew he could prove the theories.
Angle's classification system refers to the position of first molars and how they bite together and is broken into three main categories: Class I, II, III.
The classification system founded by Angle represented a milestone in the dental profession, because for the first time the concept of diagnostic arrangement based on science was discussed and it opened the way to etiological research of malocclusions. Angle was firmly persuaded that the upper first molars always erupted in a fixed, constant position on the facial bulk, "Upper first molar as basis of diagnosis in orthodontia," thereby making a set classification system that could be used universally.
This viewpoint was not accepted by a few other dentists, primarily J.N. Farrar, who refused to think this system was correct or would work in dentistry. Many other American dentists grasped this new idea of classification and a new age in orthodontia began.
It took some years for other nations of the world to grasp this system, but American universities began teaching it soon after it was introduced, with the first school of orthodontics established in 1905 by Edward Angle. Many Italian universities have yet to employ this basic system. Japan, England, and many other countries use this method of classification of the teeth, making it an international system for malocclusion in dentistry.
The classification of the teeth for malocclusion has given dentists and orthodontists a much simpler way to diagnose malocclusions. Using this classification system of the teeth universally keeps dentists and orthodontists from getting confused about bite relationships and malocclusion, and facilitates the sharing of information concerning these subjects.
Anterior—Towards the front.
Etiology—The study of the origin.
Malocclusion—The relationship of the molars is not right, known as a "bad bite."
Orthodontia—The science of studying malocclusions of the mouth.
Posterior—Towards the back.
Electronic Journal Of Orthodontics 4 (July 2000). <http://www.orthoforum.com>.
The Virtual Journal of Orthodontics 3.3 (February 2000) <http://vjco.it>.
|
|
Author Info: Cindy F. Ovard RDA, The Gale Group Inc., Gale, Detroit, Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health, 2002 |