If there's anyone out there living with diabetes who does NOT find it frustrating, send me an email. I'd like to hear your secret. For the rest of us, living with it just got that much harder through a yet another "standardized guideline" announced by the IDF (International Diabetes Foundation) last week.

"The new IDF Guideline recommends that people with diabetes try to keep post-meal blood glucose levels to less than 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) two hours following a meal."

Now I understand that postprandial (post-meal) glucose values are important, 'cause they sure can impact your A1c -- that gold standard for measuring your average glucose level over the last three months. And that's important, 'cause that helps you understand your chances of developing the nasty complications of diabetes in the long run.

So I get that the IDF feels it's important to make some kind of statement here, given that until recently, the key recommendations for good diabetes management were only about lowering your fasting or pre-meal blood glucose levels. PWDs all around the world need to know that you don't want to go sky-high after every meal.

HOWEVER -- and this is my big bone to pick -- nothing seems to be really new here except for a more aggressive number, putting yet more pressure on us patients to "perform."Guilty_tshirt

News nuggets from around the diabetes community

NEWSFLASH: FDA Clears Dexcom Share Direct
Dexcom gets regulatory approval of its 'on-the-go' mobile apps for CGM data-sharing.
State of the Union: It's Time to Cure Diabetes
President launching new precision medicine initiative to better treat, cure diseases like diabetes.
'Robotic Pancreas' Appears On American Idol
Carlos Santana's nephew Adam Lasher shows off Dexcom G4 during live performance.

closing banner

By this I mean that I thumbed through the 32-page guideline document (if it's possible to "thumb" on the Internet), and discovered that:

* most of the contents are taken up with arguing that high post-meal BG is indeed harmful, causing oxidative stress, inflammation, and other things that lead to heart disease (the same problems you get from a high A1c overall)

* the recommended "treatment strategies" are the basics: frequent SMBG (self-monitoring of blood glucose) with a traditional or continuous monitor, exercise, diet -- with an emphasis on low-GI foods -- and "a variety of pharmacologic therapies," ie. insulin and a bunch of other drugs.

I guess the idea is just to get doctors and other folks treating diabetics around the world to put more emphasis on keeping post-meal numbers low. But as we all know, the details often get lost in translation. So what's likely to come through to most patients is nothing but yet another number to stress over (!)

As a Type 1 who actually eats carbs (gasp!), I can't remember ever hitting 140 BG after a meal when I wasn't heading for a low. To be perfectly honest, I'm lucky to hit 180 post-meal most of the time, but most of the time, I still manage to get back in range by hour 3 or 3-1/2.

What I'm saying here is, most of us are going to look at that 140 goal, and feel like screaming: "Are you kidding me? I feel guilty enough all the time as it is!"

Thoughts?

Disclaimer: Content created by the Diabetes Mine team. For more details click here.

This content is created for Diabetes Mine, a consumer health blog focused on the diabetes community. The content is not medically reviewed and doesn't adhere to Healthline's editorial guidelines. For more information about Healthline's partnership with Diabetes Mine, please click here.