I should be celebrating -- shouting from the rooftops!  But instead I am stunned. Confused.  Filled with skepticism.  Those of you who've been following my DexCom adventures here know how frustrated I was when I couldn't seem to get my A1c below 7.1, despite a lot of diligence and aggravation.

But something weird happened.  I had my A1c tested again about a month later, and about 10 days after I'd set the DexCom aside for an extended break.  My result was 6.5!  Impossible, I thought.Perfect  That last month was not a good one.  I spent far too much post-meal time over 200.  How could I possibly have dropped to a happy and healthy "therapuetic target" of <7% in that time?!

I was so suspicious, in fact, that my co-author Dr. Jackson made a bet with me: go back and get another A1c test.  If it's under 7, I owe him dinner; if it's over 7, he owes me dinner.  Good deal.

And guess what?!  I owe him dinner!  My A1c as of Dec. 1 was 6.3!! 

I still can't quite make sense of it; things didn't seem to be going that much better than a few months ago.  But who am I to argue with success?

Dca2000productNOTE: We'd all have real reason to celebrate if only the new DCA 2000 Blood Glucose Tester became standard equipment at most labs.  I recently read about this device which measures your A1c with a single drop of blood. No more painful blood draws!  And you get the result in minutes.  But even though it's priced at less than $1,500 (Internet quote), it still seems to be out of reach for most labs and clinics. Or simply not a priority.  With at least 20 million of us out there requiring regular A1c testing, we ought to be lobbying somebody on this! 

Disclaimer: Content created by the Diabetes Mine team. For more details click here.


This content is created for Diabetes Mine, a consumer health blog focused on the diabetes community. The content is not medically reviewed and doesn't adhere to Healthline's editorial guidelines. For more information about Healthline's partnership with Diabetes Mine, please click here.