Assessing Fetal Lung Maturity - 2
Alveoli are like little bubbles. The laws of physics predict that because of the high ratio of surface tension to volume of little bubbles, their tendency is to collapse. To prevent this from happening, certain cells in the lungs – the type II alveolar cells – begin to excrete chemicals that can reduce the surface tension in the alveoli. These chemicals are called ‘surfactants’ and they are a complex combination of phospholipids and apoproteins. When sufficient surfactants are produced that the alveoli can remain open to function, the fetal lungs are considered ‘mature’. Prior to this time, the baby is at risk for developing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). RDS occurs in about 1% of all pregnancies and it can have serious short- and long-term consequences, involving both the lungs and other organs, that can extend beyond the neonatal period in its most severe forms.
When babies are very premature, RDS is the result of a combination of both alveolar epithelial cell immaturity (the lining cells have not yet thinned out) and a deficiency of surfactants. Later in pregnancy (“near term”), severe RDS can sometimes also occur but at this point it is usually the result of insufficient surfactants alone – but the end result can be just as devastating. Certain medical conditions can delay surfactant production in babies, the most common being maternal diabetes with poor blood sugar control and isoimmunization (such as Rh-disease). Large babies (macrosomic) are also at greater risk for RDS even if maternal diabetes is not contributing to the fetal size. Babies who have developed heart failure (hydrops fetalis) for any number of reasons can also have a relative deficiency of surfactants (as well as pulmonary edema). For reasons that are not entirely clear, babies delivered by cesarean section, particularly, when this is done prior to the onset of labor, are also at increased risk for respiratory difficulties.
The amniotic fluid is mostly fetal urine, but it is mixed with effluent from the fetal lungs as well. The fluid from the fetal lungs contains surfactants and other indicators of type II alveolar cell activity. When we perform an amniocentesis to assess fetal lung maturity, we are looking for direct and/or indirect evidence to support the presumption that there is adequate surfactant present to minimize the risk for RDS. One should realize that all of the tests we will discuss have some degree of “false positivity” – an indicator suggesting lung maturity, but the baby still develops respiratory problems – however, there is enough experience with their use that a “mature” value with a test result generally means the baby has at least a 95% chance of not developing RDS.
Having provided this information as background, the actual tests commonly used to evaluate fetal lung maturity will be discussed in our next post….
Labels: amniocentesis, diabetes, fetal lung maturity, fetal macrosomia, Rh-isoimmunization, surfactants





5 Comments:
At Thu Jul 31, 11:51:00 AM 2008,
carlac said…
Dear Dr.
At my 19wk ultrasound they found an isolated EIF the Dr. Was not worried at all he didnt even push me to have a amino he said everything else with my baby was good. Well im still very upset about this when I went to my OBGYN she made it seem like I should think about it just in case I want to terminate my pregnancy. When I had my test done every test came out normal I had a 1 out 10,000 chance of a baby having downs. Should I still worry about my child having downs should I do any other test I asked the dr. that did the ultrasound and he said he does not need to see me no more everything was great but in my head all I could do it think about the EIF. Please help.
At Thu Aug 07, 06:23:00 PM 2008,
Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…
To carlac: Listen to the doctor who did your 19 week ultrasound. I usually don't say this, but your own doctor should have left the counseling to the consultant. She did you a great disservice. With your normal maternal serum screening results, even if the EIF doubled your risk to 1 in 5000 (which it doesn't), the risk of the amnio is 10-25 times greater than the chance of having a baby with Down syndrome and if you lost a baby as the result of the amnio, the OVERWHELMING odds are that you would be losing a chromosomally NORMAL baby. Could you be the 1 in 10000...sure...but you are more likely to be in an automobile accident tomorrow! Good luck and please stop worrying! Dr T
At Mon Sep 15, 09:07:00 PM 2008,
Anonymous said…
I was rh sensitized during my third pregnancy. I know of the risks to any future pregnancy and fetus, but what risks are there to me now that I have been sensitized?
At Tue Sep 23, 06:57:00 PM 2008,
Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…
To anonymous Sept 15: None, unless you are given Rh-positive blood! Dr T
At Mon Jan 05, 07:11:00 AM 2009,
mlm said…
Dear Dr. T,
This blog is a lifesaver. I found out on Friday that my 1st trimester screen had abnormal results for trisomy 18--1:61. I am currently 16 weeks,and will be 43 at time of delivery. We have been given the option of amnio or ultrasound. However, I have had some issues with spotting/light bleeding (baby has been fine thus far), and was told that my risk of miscarriage if I choose amnio would be slightly higher, due to the bleeding.
I would really like to know if this baby has trisomy 18, so that I/we can be prepared, however, we would be devastated if the baby was normal, and then I miscarried after the amnio. This will probably be our last pregnancy.
For now, my husband and I opted for the ultrasound, but I would like to know what you think re: risk of amnio, as well as odds of a later more detailed ultrasound detecting Trisomy 18. Can I opt to do an amnio later, if the spotting stops, or is the optimal time now?
Thank you so much!
Post a Comment
<< Home