Diabetes in Pregnancy - 10 - Preconceptional Evaluation of Pregestational Diabetics
I see several major goals of management of the pregestational diabetic:
• Reduce the risk of early fetal wastage
• Reduce the risk of fetal malformations
• Reduce the risk of progression of maternal ‘end-organ’ disease (e.g., kidney, eye, and cardiovascular disease)
• Reduce the risk of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, urinary tract infections, and premature labor and delivery
• Reduce the risk of epigenetic ‘programming’ of the baby’s metabolic pathways
• Reduce the risk of fetal damage and loss in later gestation
• Reduce the risk of fetal macrosomia
• Reduce the risk of traumatic delivery
• Reduce the risk of neonatal complications such as hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and pulmonary immaturity
To have the greatest impact on all of the above, preconceptional counseling and care, aggressive, ongoing maternal management, and fetal assessment and surveillance throughout the pregnancy are required. A pregestational diabetic should not wait until she has a confirmed pregnancy to see her doctor. Fetal wastage (miscarriages) and major fetal malformations are directly related to the degree of mother’s blood sugar control in early pregnancy. Poorly-controlled diabetics can have 3 to 10 times the fetal malformation rates of nondiabetic women and numerous studies have proven that diabetic women with normal blood sugars during the embryonic period have no higher rate of fetal abnormalities than nondiabetic women.
Major fetal abnormalities now account for 20-50% of the perinatal deaths accompanying pregnancies of pregestational diabetics. Although there is no specific ‘diabetic syndrome’, the most common congenital malformations include neural tube, heart, skeletal, and abdominal wall defects. An unusual condition called ‘caudal regression syndrome’, associated with poor development of the lower fetal spine and severe structural abnormalities below the waist, is rarely seen in babies of nondiabetic women (Kucera, et al., J Reprod Med 1971;7:73-82). The reason preconceptional care is so important is that these malformations can occur as the result of poor control of blood sugars within two weeks after the first missed menstrual period signaling pregnancy (for example, the neural tube should be completely closed by day 26 following conception).
Another reason preconceptional evaluation and care is important is that it provides the opportunity to identify and optimize therapy for other medical problems, related and unrelated to the diabetes, that may put both mother and baby at risk for complications during a pregnancy. For example, long-standing, poorly-controlled diabetes is often accompanied by kidney damage (diabetic nephropathy), eye damage (retinopathy), atherosclerotic disease, hypertension, as well as peripheral and autonomic neuropathies. When these conditions are present, pregnancy can increase progression of these ‘end-organ’ problems and the presence of these underlying defects themselves are red flags for risks associated with pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery, stillbirths, and infectious complications during pregnancy. Type 1 diabetics are also at increased risk for thyroid disease (also autoimmune in origin) at a rate about three times that of the general population.
With all that said and done, in addition to the routine pregnancy laboratory studies, and counseling regarding nutrition, exercise, self-monitoring and expected levels of blood sugar control we have discussed in earlier posts in this series, any woman with pregestational diabetes should have at least the following studies done, preconceptionally, or as early in pregnancy as possible, to establish a reference baseline for counseling and follow-up evaluation during the pregnancy:
• Complete physical examination
• Ophthalmologic examination
• 24 hour urine for protein and creatinine clearance
• Hemoglobin A1c
• Thyroid stimulating hormone
• Fasting lipid profile
• Electrocardiogram with any evidence of vascular disease by history or physical exam and in all with diabetes > 10 years duration
If one is fortunate enough to see the woman for preconceptional counseling, once the laboratory results are available, any new problems (e.g., thyroid disease, hypertension) should be addressed medically in preparation for pregnancy. In addition, I will usually recommend a prenatal vitamin, supplemental folic acid (2-4 mg per day) as a means, perhaps, of reducing certain congenital birth defects, as well as low-dose aspirin (81 mg per day), particularly for those with long-standing diabetes or evidence of vascular disease.
Labels: preconceptional counseling, pregestational diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes





2 Comments:
At Fri Feb 08, 11:15:00 AM 2008,
Anonymous said…
Dr. Trofatter:
I'm not diabetic, or pre-diabetic, but is there a "silent" condition related??
I'm 34-yrs.old and have no significant health history. My blood pressure is great, I'm thin/athletic, and have never smoked. My only problems are a stillbirth of 23-weeks and a missed-miscarriage of @ 8-weeks; both in 2007...and both chromosomally normal. (My husband and I have no living children. He's the only partner I've had.) I have now been diagnosed as MTHFR Compound Heterozygous C677T/A1298C and PAI-1 Heterozygous 4G/5G. My hematologist is the author of several of the studies relating PAI-1 mutations to pregnancy loss...he seems to think this is the cause of my losses and has prescribed Metformin 500mg twice daily, Lovenox 40mg twice daily, baby aspirin,prenatal, and progesterone suppositories...along with Metanx (folic acid)twice a day.
I had constant bleeding during the first pregnancy, which resulted in PPROM at 21-weeks and then spontaneous labor at 23-weeks. I had Chorioamnionitis w/Group B Strep and my son was septic from Group B Strep. Blood clots were found with the placenta. The 2nd pregnancy was COMPLETELY different...no bleeding...things appeared great...no heartbeat found at 12-weeks...D&C.
Can a patient just have a genetic "marker" for a condition (PAI-1 being related to Diabetes and PCOS) without any outward symptoms and have that mutation go crazy during pregnancy? I do have some diabetes in my family, at least one cousin with PCOS and many relatives who've had cardiovascular disease. How can I have NO problems not pregnant, and then fall apart when I am pregnant? Thx. Mofolady
At Thu Feb 14, 05:08:00 PM 2008,
Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…
To mofolady Feb 8: Honestly, I am not sure the two losses are related. Any pregnancy complicated by bleeding runs the risk of following the course of your first pregnancy. When you have prolonged or intermittent bleeding (from any cause), the blood can change the pH of the vagina so that unfavorable bacteria begin to proliferate (often there is an odor associated with this, but not always). Bleeding also washes out the protective mucous in the cervical canal and the blood itself is a wonderful culture medium for the bad bacteria to grow and follow a path up your cervix to the membranes, placenta, and finally the baby. Once infection with certain bacteria gets into the uterus, the membranes can rupture or a vicious cycle can ensue in which you bleed more, begin to cramp, and eventually separate the placenta prematurely (placental abruption) just as you describe in your comment!. You had GBS, and even though many women are colonized with this and have no problems, your risk for complications was probably greater because of the bleedng. Regardless, why don't you follow the recommendations of your hematologist. I don't know if they will help in your case (but they might!), and I also do not think they will hurt. I would also suggest periodic evaluation during the next pregnancy with urine cultures (treatment of these aggressively if abnormal) and perhaps even evaluation of cervical length by ultrasound in midtrimester. Your doctor can explain my concerns behind this recommendation. With your quesion related to a 'silent' condition, it is possible you have some degree of 'insulin resistance' that does not manifest itself as diabetes or other obvious problems at this time because of your good health otherwise. The metformin should take care of that concern. At your age, endometriosis is another factor that could have contributed to both of your pregnancy losses. Good luck to you and thank for reading! Dr T
Post a Comment
<< Home