Follow Healthline   |   Healthline on TwitterTwitter   |   Healthline on FacebookFacebook
Symptom Search   |   Treatment Search   |   Doctor Search   |   Drug Search
Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhDPregnancy and Childbirth
Advertisement

Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1): Role in Adverse Pregnancy Outcome? - 6 - Treatment and Response Accompany Improved Outcomes

Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD
In the last several posts, we have presented support from the literature that links imbalances in the fibrinolytic system, as reflected in increased activity of PAI-1, or a genetic predisposition for the same, with adverse pregnancy outcome, both late and early in pregnancy. With regard to specific mechanisms contributing to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in early pregnancy, we have reviewed evidence to support that aberrations of PAI-1 production could potentially have deleterious effects on ovulation, establishment and maintenance of the corpus luteum (which is essential for ‘progesterone support’ of early pregnancy), and early implantation/placentation of the embryo. In our final post (whew, finally!) on this subject, let’s look at data that would support the premise that down-regulation of PAI-1 production can be accomplished during pregnancy, or in anticipation of pregnancy, in ways that would be safe for both mother and baby, and might improve pregnancy success. At the outset, let me tell you that there is a plethora of information regarding ‘treatment’ of PAI-1 abnormalities under various clinical circumstances, but I would like to highlight only a few articles that pertain directly to pregnancy and RPL.

Bremer and colleagues in 1995 (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:986-91) performed a small study in which they “assessed the effects of a daily oral dose of 60 to 80 mg of aspirin from 12 weeks gestation until delivery on fibrinolytic variables before and after parturition…in 24 patients, eight receiving low-dose aspirin and 16 controls…The only maternal fibrinolytic variable affected…was plasminogen activator inhibitor activity, which showed a significant reduction before and after parturition of 40% and 70%, respectively, in low-dose aspirin users compared with controls.” None of these patients were reported to have significant pregnancy complications. Since aspirin is not known to have a direct effect on PAI-1 production or activity, it was concluded that the reduction in PAI activity is probably the result of inhibition of platelet reactivity.

In another study published the same year, Gris and colleagues (Thromb Haemost 1995;73:362-7) identified 30 women with a history of unexplained RPL and “an impaired fibrinolytic capacity.” Without identifying the specific reasons for their fibrinolytic imbalances, these women were randomized to begin prior to conception either low-molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) 20 mg per day or a phenformin-like substance, moroxydine chloride, 1200 mg per day. After one month of treatment, if their fibrinolytic status normalized, therapy was continued for 6 months with the intention to continue treatment if they became pregnant; and, if their fibrinolytic status did not improve after one month, they were switched to the drug they did not receive the first time. The results were actually quite dramatic. With regard to normalization of fibrinolytic status, 20 out of 29 women responded to the first- or second-line enoxaparin treatment whereas did only 1 of 19 treated with moroxydine. Sixteen of 20 enoxaparin responders conceived compared to only 2 of 10 nonresponders (p = 0.002); and, 13 of 16 enoxaparin responder pregnancies resulted in live births compared to none of the 2 nonresponders (p = 0.02). This was compelling evidence that ‘anticoagulation therapy’ at subtherapeutic levels with a heparin compound might improve pregnancy outcome in women identified to have underlying hypofibrinolytic imbalances without even delving into the specific causes of these imbalances.

In 2000, Bick (Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2000;6:115-25) reviewed the results of anticoagulation therapy in women with histories of RPL and no identifiable chromosomal, hormonal, or anatomical defects. Of the 160 women analyzed, 150 (94%) were found to have coagulation defects, and 38 were found to have more than one of the defects for which they were screened. Their mean age was 33 years and their mean number of miscarriages before referral was three. 149 women were treated preconceptionally with aspirin (81 mg/day) and, immediately following conception, were begun on unfractionated heparin 5000U every 12 hours, both of which were continued until delivery. The remarkable results of this study were that only 2 of the 149 women failed therapy and to have a live birth. This translates to a ‘success rate’ of 98%! In a subsequent report (Bick and Hoppensteadt, Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2005;11:1-13), among 351 women with RPL who had no other identifiable cause, 322 (92%) were found to have coagulation abnormalities. Those with ‘thrombophilias’ were treated preconceptionally with aspirin (81 mg/day), to which was added following conception, unfractionated heparin (5000U/24 hr) in the first 120 patients, or the low molecular weight heparin, dalteparin (5000U/day), in the next 192 patients. (Patients with MTHFR polymorphisms were also treated with folic acid 5 mg /day and pyridoxine (vitamin B6) 50 mg/day). As the authors reported, “Only 2 of the thrombophilia patients suffered another miscarriage; all others had a normal term delivery” for an overall success rate of 94%.

Also in 2000, Glueck and colleagues (Fertil Steril 2000;74:396-7) presented a case report of a 32 year old woman with amenorrhea and infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who had failure of 7 out of 10 IVF embryo transfers, 1 premature live birth, and two pregnancy losses at 8 and 17 weeks. She was obese, had high fasting serum insulin, androstenedione, and testosterone levels, and was also found to have a modest deficiency in protein S and the 4G4G polymorphism of PAI-1, accompanied by high PAI-1 activity. The combination of the protein S deficiency and the elevated PAI-1 characterized her as having “familial thrombophilia and hypofibrinolysis.” Although not overtly ‘diabetic’, she was begun on metformin (2.55 g/day) and a weight reduction program. Metformin is an oral drug used to treat type 2 diabetes. It improves blood sugar control by various mechanisms, decreasing glucose production by the liver, decreasing absorption of glucose in the gastrointestinal tract, and probably, most importantly, by increasing insulin sensitivity, accompanied by improved peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. Over the course of 4 months, her weight fell from 109 to 91.3 kg (16%), her insulin, androstenedione, and testosterone levels normalized, as did her PAI-1 activity levels.

As a follow-up to this case report, Glueck’s group (Fertil Steril 2001;75:46-52) reported preliminary results from an ongoing pilot study to determine whether metformin could reduce the rate of first trimester pregnancy loss in women with PCOS. They identified 19 women with PCOS who did not have overt diabetes and placed them on metformin (1.5-2.55 g/day) throughout pregnancy. Ten of the women had previously conceived but had miscarried 16 of their 22 pregnancies (73%). “While receiving metformin, these 10 women had 6 normal live births (60%), 1 spontaneous abortion (10%), and 3 normal ongoing pregnancies (30%)” all > 13 weeks. Up to the time of the report, among all 19 women receiving metformin, 9 (47%) had normal term live births, 2 (11%) had normal, but preterm births at 33 and 35 weeks, 6 (32%) had normal ongoing pregnancies beyond 1 weeks, 2 (10.5%) had first trimester miscarriages. No adverse maternal side-effects, nor birth defects were attributed to metformin in this small study. Most importantly, for purposes of our discussion here, “among women who received metformin before conception, reductions in insulin and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity were correlated (r = 0.65; P = .04).” Thus, metformin alone appeared to improve pregnancy outcome in a group of PCOS patients who had either had, or were at increased risk, for early pregnancy loss.

In a subsequent prospective study, Glueck and colleagues (Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2004;10:323-34) evaluated the efficacy of combined therapy with metformin (1.5 to 2.55 g/day) and enoxaparin (60 mg/day) in women with PCOS and one or more previous early pregnancy losses, thrombophilia, and/or hypofibrinolysis. “Of the 24 women, 23 had 65 previous pregnancies…with 18 live births, 46 spontaneous abortions (71%), and one elective abortion.” Of these 23 women, seven had 3 or more consecutive losses, two had 2 consecutive losses, thirteen had 1 loss, and one woman had a live birth in a pregnancy complicated by HELLP syndrome. Compared to ‘controls’ with no history of adverse pregnancy outcome, the 24 women in this study had a higher frequency of the factor V Leiden mutation (17% vs.2%; P = 0.016), the PAI-1 4G4G polymorphism (46% vs 24%; P = 0.031), higher levels of the PAI-1 gene product and PAI-1 activity (33% vs 8%; P = 0.018), and a higher frequency of elevated factor VIII levels (22% vs 0%; P = 0.037). Of the 23 women who conceived on enoxaparin-metformin to date in the report, they had had 26 pregnancies (28 fetuses), with 20 live births, two ongoing pregnancies > 13 weeks, and 6 spontaneous early losses (21%), 3.4-fold lower than in their previous pregnancies. Again, no adverse maternal or fetal therapy effects were noted.

The articles cited above, have suggested that under various conditions associated with fibrinolytic imbalance and RPL, correction of the imbalance is at least a marker for, if not a direct contributor to, improved first trimester pregnancy success. None of these studies have really confirmed that improvement in pregnancy outcome could be directly correlated with reduction in PAI-1 activity. In the early 1980’s it became recognized that women with PCOS, who ovulated poorly or not at all, would sometimes benefit from partial removal (wedge resection) of their ovaries, or even complete removal of an ovary. This was frequently accompanied by spontaneous ovulation and a decrease in the male hormones (androgens) that can be produced in excess by the ovaries of women with PCOS. Various techniques were employed over the years to reduce the ovarian tissue mass that resulted in the hormonal imbalances accompanying PCOS, but in 1989, Daniell and Miller (Fertil Steril 1989;51:232) described a laparoscopic technique termed ‘ovarian drilling’ in which 4-20 hormone-producing follicles (cysts) on one or both ovaries were pierced and cauterized using laser or electrocautery techniques. This procedure resulted in a dramatic decrease in male hormone levels within days, spontaneous ovulation in 70-90% of women, and a 40-60% probability of pregnancy within a year. Palomba and colleagues (Fertil Steril 2005;84:761-5) performed a comparative study of women with PCOS and elevated PAI-1 levels who underwent ovarian drilling with or without treatment with metformin. Ovarian drilling alone did not reduce PAI-1 activity, whereas metformin administration did. Furthermore they found that a lack of decrease in PAI-1 activity was related to a high risk of miscarriage in those women who conceived following ovarian drilling. These findings suggest that fibrinolytic imbalance, characterized by elevated levels of PAI-1, is an independent risk factor for RPL.

In closing, let me return to one more study by Glueck and colleagues (Metabolism 2006:55:345-52) that we cited in an earlier post. We mentioned previously that results in this study of women with PCOS demonstrated that PAI-1 activity was independently and positively associated with risk for first trimester miscarriage and that “for each 5 IU/mL increment in PAI-1 activity, the risk of being in an adverse first-trimester miscarriage category increased.” What we did not mention before is that prospectively, women in this study were placed on metformin prior to conception and their subsequent pregnancy outcome was assessed and correlated with changes in PAI-1 activity. “From pretreatment to the last preconception visit on glucophage (metformin), in 30 women who subsequently had live births, PAI-1 activity fell 44%, but rose 19% in 23 (also metformin treated) women with first-trimester miscarriage (P = 0.03).” Furthermore, “in the 30 women with live birth pregnancies, median PAI-1 activity fell continuously through the first trimester…, whereas PAI-1 activity was either unchanged or rose in women with first-trimester miscarriage.” Therefore, not only is increased PAI-1 activity an independent risk factor for RPL, but failure of response to therapy, as reflected in lack of normalization of PAI-1 levels also appears to be as well.

At the outset of this series, I dedicated the work to one of our readers (IR) who has had recurrent miscarriages and asked me many months ago about my thoughts on the relationship of PAI-1 activity and RPL. During the course of reviewing the literature I have come to the conclusion that there certainly is a correlation between the two. Perhaps the most compelling evidence resides in the observations that ‘appropriate’ PAI-1 activity appears to be a part of normal ovulation and implantation/placentation in early pregnancy. It is easy to speculate how imbalances at these critical times could interfere with early pregnancy success, regardless of the underlying causes that led to these imbalances. It would appear that efforts to improve a ‘hypofibrinolytic’ state, reflected in women with RPL and increased PAI-1 activity, should be considered as part of any therapeutic regimen. Preconceptional weight reduction, if indicated, treatment with metformin, low-dose aspirin, supplemental folic acid and B-vitamins, ovulation induction with progesterone support, and prophylactic use of heparin or low-molecular weight heparin under these conditions are all options that can be employed and have a wide margin of safety for both mother and baby.

So, IR, I hope this helps. And, I really hope that sometime soon you conceive the baby you are destined to carry. I know you will be a great Mom!
Dr T

Labels: , ,

Permalink | Email Post

14 Comments:

  • At Sun Nov 25, 03:11:00 PM 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hi Dr. Trofatter,
    I just wanted to THANK YOU for your time and knowledge. These PAI 1 explanations are very informative and beneficial. :)
    Sincerely, Izzi

     
  • At Fri Dec 07, 04:20:00 PM 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dr T., Thank you for this very interesting series on PAI-1. From my own personal experience with this defect (4G/4G mutation), I have found that most doctors are still not sure what to make of the experimental data to date. In general, I have received the following comments: 1) I don't think you have a blood clotting problem because you have no history of blood clotting even when you were on birth control pills. 2) I don't test for PAI-1 because regardless of the result I would suggest a person with repetitive miscarriages of your type try Lovenox therapy. 3) I think you do have blood clotting concerns but I don't think this is because of PAI-1. I suspect you have a yet-to-be-discovered variant of Factor V Leiden. As for the first comment, my only thoughts are that somehow the interaction of PAI-1 and PAI-2 might be responsible for the blood clotting concerns during pregnancy. During one prior miscarriage, it was documented that my Protein S level plummeted in the early weeks of pregnancy, suggesting clotting activity was occurring. I continue to watch for news about PAI-1 and other clotting-related causes of pregnancy loss. I am hopeful that your series will encourage others to look more closely at this interesting gene.

     
  • At Wed Dec 12, 06:38:00 PM 2007, Blogger Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…

    To Anonymous Dec 7: Thank you for your thoughtful response. What led to your being tested for PAI-1 in the first place? Was it repetitive pregnancy losses or complications? Anyway, one of the things that dawned on me while writing this series is that the issues related to thrombosis (clotting) and those related to hypofibrinolysis, though related, may actually be SEPARATE issues when it comes to pregnancy complications. What I tried to point out is that even though hypofibrinolysis leads to thrombosis, it might also lead to other more subtle defects (impaired ovulation and/or implantation) that are not related at all to thrombosis! I think this is a subtle point that most providers have missed. Of course when both occur, you've got the double whammy to contend with regard to suboptimal pregnancy outcome. Of course, your doctor may be correct - you have some other problem that we have not gotten smart enough to figure out and, he/she is also correct that an empiric course of therapy is warranted even if we don't know what we are treating! By the way, protein S levels usually do drop,even during normal pregnancies, that's why we don't like to screen for protein S and, to a lesser degree, protein C deficiencies during pregnancy. Again thank you for reading and best of luck yo you! Dr T

     
  • At Wed Jan 02, 09:43:00 PM 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    After three miscarriages I was just told by my doctor that all of my blood tests were normal except for PAI-1. They are ordering a "ECLP" blood test to confirm the PAI-1 test. What is the ECLP test for? What are the possible therapies to correct a PAI-1 problem, and how effective are therapies in reducing the risk of miscarrying again?

     
  • At Thu Jan 17, 11:41:00 AM 2008, Blogger Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…

    To Anonymous Jan 2: Sorry, I am not familiar with the "ECLP" test, so you will have to give me more information on that one! I probably know it by a different name. It might be a screen for the genetic polymorphisms associated with over-production of PAI-1. Regardless, the basic approaches to normalizing PAI-1 levels include weight reduction, exercise, aspirin, and metformin. Any or all of these will improve your prospects for pregnancy if the problems you have had are related to the elevated PAI-1 levels. Thanks for reading and your patience in waiting for my response! Best wishes. Dr T

     
  • At Wed Aug 13, 01:44:00 PM 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I am 43 years old and have just had a PAI test done by my new Gyn. I have a history of 4 premature babies and a mild stroke at age 27.(dr's said it was birth control and smoking) My PAI is elavated and I will be going to a Hematologist. I am not having anymore children and had a tubla years ago. How can this effect me now and should my children be tested for this??

     
  • At Sat Aug 16, 07:14:00 PM 2008, Blogger Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…

    To anonymous Aug 13: I am curious as to what other tests fo "thrombophilias" you had done. Regardless, the hematologist will be in the best position to put all the pieces together and counsel you as to risks and how those can be minimized. Best of luck and please let us know what you find out! Dr T

     
  • At Thu Sep 04, 11:45:00 AM 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hi Dr. T:

    I wrote to you some months ago with a dx of positive for PA-1 4g/5g allele" and have had 4 miscarriages, 3 in the second trimester and the fourth in the first. I have had every treatment under the sun, no other complications other than PCOS. for the last pregnancy, they gave me Lovenox 2 per day at 40mg, plus baby aspirin. There was bleeding and subsequently a miscarriage. My question is, a new RE i'm seeing is offering me a new treatment of Metformin, baby aspiring prior to conception and then when I conceive 40mg of Lovenox. What research is out there for people with PA1 with recurrent preg. loss in second trimester, and the use of metformin? CAn metformin be used for an entire pregnancy. I'm at the end of my rope and I really would like to have a baby so I am willing to try something new. Thank you in advance.

     
  • At Sun Sep 21, 04:32:00 PM 2008, Blogger Kenneth F. Trofatter, Jr., MD, PhD said…

    To anonymous Sept 4: I apologize for the delay in answering, but I JUST got your comment delivered to my mailbox today. One investigator in our department, Dr. Bruce Lessey, is finding that many women in your situation have subclinical endometriosis as a presumptive cause of their recurrent early pregnancy losses. Among his suggestions are that you receive 3-4 months of Lupron (as a means of suppressing endometriosis and its effects on the receptors in the endometrium, and then undergo ovulation induction. In your case, taking metformin during the same time period might also be beneficial. Adding the aspirin and Lovenox at that point could then be done just as has been recommended to you. Ask your doctor about this option. Best regards. Dr T

     
  • At Sat Dec 13, 06:21:00 PM 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dear Dr. Trofatter;
    I have been extensibly worked up for RPL and it shows I am homozygous for HAI 1 4G 5G. HETEROZYGOUS FOR MTHFR, Factor X111, and B-fibrinogen.
    I have had 3 miscarriages all at about 6 weeks. Would lovonox or heparin help in this case, all other tests were normal.
    My husband was azospermic and had aspiration of sperm. We have heard that his sperm may by the problem as well and will be doing sperm DNA testing.
    What are you thoughts....Thanks in advance for commentsà
    kAREN

     
  • At Thu Dec 18, 06:02:00 AM 2008, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dear Dr. T.
    I have had numerous tests run for recurrent miscarriage and the only one coming back abnormal was thrombophelia panel. Heterzygous for mthfr, factor x111, B-finbrinogen and homozygous for PAI -1 4G 5G. Please let me know if this is treatable with lovonox and what else you may suggest.
    Thank you

     
  • At Tue Jan 06, 04:54:00 PM 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dear Dr. Trofatter;

    I would really like to thank you for your time. I am hoping you can provide me with some answers to my questions my RE has not answered for me.
    I am 39 and have now had 3 early losses all about 6 weeks. I have been extensibly worked up and everything came back negative except for PAI 1-4g5g homozygous, and hetero for factor v111,fibrinogen and MTHFR. I am very healthy other than severe Raynauds at times with no other symptoms.
    In order to obtain these pregnancies we used aspirated sperm due to obstruction of my husband due to bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Good viable sperm was found. Will plan to do the dna fragmentation test with the next aspiration.
    For now Iam going to do a frozen transfer with existing frozen embryo. MY RE is going to put my on heparin 5000 u sq bid, asa 81mg od, folgard.
    Now what are your thoughts on low dose dexamethasone due to Raynauds just in case!!When should this be start. What about Metformin as precaution for endo.... My family doctor is willing to help me and put me on whatever may be beneficial to maintain this next pregnancy. But Of course I don;t want to cause harm to the fetus... Also do you recommend lovonox over heparin and what dose. What are the advantages of starting the blood thinner after a positive pregnancy test. I have read alot of people are starting 2 days prior to embryo transfer. I truly appreciate any comments you have with this matter...

    Sincerely;
    Karen

     
  • At Thu Apr 09, 11:23:00 AM 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dear Dr Trofatter,
    After two consecutive miscarriages in six months, (one at 7 weeks, the last one at 8) I was diagnosed with compound heterozygous MTHFR C677T AND A12988C mutation and homozygous (4g/4g) PAI 1 5G/4G ALLELE. My doctor put me on foltex and told me that when I get pregnant again he would put me on lovenox. I couldn't stand going through another miscarriage again, Is this is the right treatment? My homocysteine is 7.1, but I never got tested for Pai levels. I've been reading about metformin, but my Dr never mention this drug. Is there anything I can do to improve my chances of having a healthy pregnancy BEFORE I know I'm pregnant? What's the best treatment? I will appreciate any information you can provide. Thank you so much!! Gabby

     
  • At Mon Aug 03, 09:11:00 AM 2009, Blogger Amy said…

    I am 27 years old and have Ehlers Danlos syndrome (classic type) and PAI-1 mutation. I had a pulmonary embolism after a car accident in 2004. I am open to adoption as I and my two siblings are all adopted. I have limited info on my birth-family but I do know that my birth mother had blood clotting issues and mitral valve prolapse, multiple heart attacks and now has an internal defibrolator. I want to know if you think it would be safe for me to even try to carry a child. My husband is 35.

    Thanks

     

Post a Comment

<< Home

The Healthline Site, its content, such as text, graphics, images, search results, HealthMaps, Trust Marks, and other material contained on the Healthline Site ("Content"), its services, and any information or material posted on the Healthline Site by third parties are provided for informational purposes only. None of the foregoing is a substitute for professional medical advice, examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Healthline Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. Please read the Terms of Service for more information regarding use of the Healthline Site.