Monday, February 13, 2012
Monday, February 13, 2012
Joshua Schwimmer, MD, FACP, FASNTechnology in Medicine

Welcome to Health Matters. As we make improvements to Healthline, Health Matters has been put on hold. You can still read all of our experts' great articles on Healthline, but there'll be no new ones posted while we work diligently to enhance the Health Matters section. Comments have also been temporarily disabled. Check back soon for the new and improved health expert area of Healthline.
Advertisement

Information Overload, the Index Medicus, and PubMed

Joshua Schwimmer, MD, FACP, FASN

index medicusImage by Nuevo Anden via Flickr

The growth of medical knowledge is difficult to visualize. One classic representation is the Index Medicus — a comprehensive index of medical journal articles — whose bound copies filled the shelves of medical libraries for 125 years. In 2004, however, the National Library of Medicine decided to stop publishing the Index. The first reason was practical: the Index Medicus had grown from 82 pounds in 1985 to an estimated 152 pounds in 2004. The second and more important reason was the widespread availability of the search engine PubMed — an electronic database of medical literature available for free via the Internet — which made the printed index obsolete. Compared to the Index Medicus, PubMed was more convenient, could be searched more easily, could be updated more quickly, and certainly weighed less. Copies of the Index Medicus are now a historical curiosity; many physicians now search the medical literature exclusively through PubMed.

The story of the Index Medicus and its successor, PubMed, illustrates three ideas.

First, the quantity of new medical information is more than any single physician can absorb, and keeping up to date with this expanding body of knowledge is challenging. As of April 2009, for example, PubMed contained information on 18,782,970 citations in the medical literature and was adding over 670,000 new entries per year. Doctors must not only absorb this flood of new ideas about treating, diagnosing, preventing, and understanding disease — deciding which information is relevant and which is not — but also learn how to apply and explain this knowledge to the patient sitting with them in the exam room or laying ill in a hospital bed.

Second, in parallel with this unprecedented expansion in medical knowledge, new media and technologies have emerged — of which PubMed is one example — which has made the task of searching, organizing, and retrieving relevant information easier. Potential sources of information for physicians include not only printed journal articles like those indexed in PubMed, but lectures, case conferences, and newer Internet resources such as reference tools (e.g., UpToDate), discussion groups, online expert systems, clinical resource tools, and podcasts.

Third, the expansion of medical information and proliferation of new technologies has required physicians to develop new skills and strategies to keep their knowledge current. Often, the availability of new knowledge overwhelms physicians’ ability to process it, a condition known as information overload. In physician’s offices, one symptom of information overload is the common spectacle of unread piles of medical journals stacked up on every available horizontal space.

While many medical schools now require classes on searching the medical literature and evidence-based medicine, few resources have been available designed to teach physicians how to learn and practice medicine more efficiently. (That's why, over two years ago, I started writing The Efficient MD blog.)

Since then, I'm glad to report that online resources for physicians have proliferated. Ways of improving efficiency and reducing information overload are now common topics on medical blogs. For example, see recents posts in Life in the Fast Lane, Clinical Cases and Images, and Musings of a Distractible Mind.

Thanks for reading!

--

(Much appreciation to Jacque-Lynne Schulman, Stephen Greenberg, Margaret Vugrin, and Dean Giustini for helping me with an updated estimate of the weight of the Index Medicus. Any inaccuracies in this post are, of course, my own.)
(This post is also published on The Efficient MD blog.)

Permalink and Comments | | Email Post

Case Study of a Physician's Use of the iPhone 3GS (Part 1)

Joshua Schwimmer, MD, FACP, FASN
I recently upgraded my original iPhone, which I purchased two years ago, to the iPhone 3GS. Truthfully, I wasn't expecting much of a change. Sure, I read the marketing hype — faster processor! 3G speed! GPS! voice control! better camera! — but I didn't expect the new model to make much of a difference in my daily clinical practice as a nephrologist.

Boy, was I wrong. I've been using the 3GS so much that by the end of the day, I've not only burned through the iPhone's battery, but I often burn through the external battery in my Mophie Juice Pack Air case as well. (I highly recommend the Mophie, by the way, which removes a subtle disincentive to using the device because you're worried you may run out of battery life.)


The following is a multi-part description of my own use of the iPhone 3GS. In my experience, the best way to learn to use a new gadget is to look over the shoulders of others, watch how they use it, ask lots of questions, and experiment constantly. (Most iPhone owners are familiar with the phenomenon of having someone grab their phone, scroll through the applications they have installed and ask, "What's that one do?")

So if you have an iPhone, and are a health care professional or patient, this will hopefully be helpful. Even if you don't have an iPhone, some of the applications I describe are available for other PDAs — or they soon will be, since the iPhone has significantly raised the bar for what a mobile device can accomplish.

(Original drafts of these posts were written on the iPhone app BlogPress.)

(This post also appears on The Efficient MD.)

Permalink and Comments | | Email Post

The Healthline Site, its content, such as text, graphics, images, search results, HealthMaps, Trust Marks, and other material contained on the Healthline Site ("Content"), its services, and any information or material posted on the Healthline Site by third parties are provided for informational purposes only. None of the foregoing is a substitute for professional medical advice, examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Healthline Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911 immediately. Please read the Terms of Service for more information regarding use of the Healthline Site.

Copyright © 2005 - 2012 Healthline Networks, Inc. All rights reserved.
Healthline is for informational purposes and should not be considered medical advice, diagnosis or treatment recommendations. more details