Welcome to Health Matters. As we make improvements to Healthline, Health Matters has been put on hold. You can still read all of our experts' great articles on Healthline, but there'll be no new ones posted while we work diligently to enhance the Health Matters section. Comments have also been temporarily disabled. Check back soon for the new and improved health expert area of Healthline.
Advertisement
Tech Medicine Signing Off
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Joshua Schwimmer, MD, FACP, FASN
I'll be taking a break from Tech Medicine as Healthline redesigns its Health Experts Network. If you're interested in more musings on technology and medicine, here's how to find me:
The Unofficial Apple Weblog features a review of Carter's Encyclopedia of Health and Medicine, an app designed specifically for the iPad. (This is not an eBook, but a full app with searchable interactive skeletons, etc.) Check out the video:
CareCloud, a new cloud-based EHR, plans to have an iPad version. Epic already has an iPhone app and presumably will have an iPad version available. Allscripts is rumored to have an upcoming EHR for the iPad. (No word on whether other EHRs plan on having an iPad app. If you have any information, please post a comment.)
Finally, on Satish Misra attempts to temper the enthusiasms surrounding the iPad. On a post on KevinMD.com titled "Why healthcare may not embrace the iPad," Misra notes that the iPad lacks some features identified as "must-have" in a survey of physicians, including fingerprint access, an RFID reader, camera, and a barcode scanner. However, he noted that many physicians are enthusiastic about the iPad, and according to an Epocrates survey, 20% plan to buy one within 1 year and at least 40% are interested.
I'll have more information about the iPad next week (after I've had a chance to actually test it myself). Stay tuned.
Spoiler alert. Atul's Gawandes new book, The Checklist Manifesto, begins and ends with an ocean of blood. Each of these gruesome bookends is a surgical catastrophe which illustrates the major point of the book: how a simple, "unsexy" checklist can improve medical care.
Many excellent reviews of The Checklist Manifesto have already been written. (See, for example, Bob Wachter's.) You may have read these reviews. You may have decided that the book's apparently simple premise — checklists improve medical care, okay, I got it — means you don't have to read it. You'd be wrong.
This is the third Gawande book I've read, and it's his best one. (That's saying something, because I was previously interviewed by Google and heaped praise on Gawande's book Complications. See my discussion of that book on Tech Medicine here.) The Checklist Manifesto is about medical care, but less than a third of it is directly related to medicine. During the book's spiral meandering, it discusses the applications of checklists in construction, aviation, finance, rock tours, and restaurants.
Far from diluting the point, these forays into other fields strengthen the idea that practicing medicine is so complex that simple tools are needed and other professions have already figured this out. (Besides, it's entertaining to hear the surgeon Gawande tell about his visits to the kitchens of restaurants where they won't let him touch their knives, his vertigo at the top of half-built buildings where he's lectured about checklists in construction, and his own failure at creating a surgical checklist which required a visit to Boeing's "checklist factory" where aviation checklists are made.)
Gawande's book has been occasionally criticized for not presenting a "balanced" view of checklists. The concern is that checklists add layers of bureaucracy and eliminate spontaneity and free thinking. While this is a valid point, the book's main focus — it's a manifesto, after all — is that well-designed checklists, which take care of the simple tasks, actually allow professionals more freedom and spontaneity by allowing them to concentrate on the complex parts of their jobs.
When you type a search query into Google's web search, a feature called Google Suggest will offer searches that other users have typed that are similar to the one you're typing. Sometimes, this can provide an eye-opening view of how the Internet — or at least, the people who search Google — feel about a particular topic.
For example, here are the Google suggested searches for "Doctors are..."
In case you were wondering — no, thousands are people aren't all searching for "doctors are sadists who like to play god and watch lesser people scream" because they necessarily feel that way — it's a quote from the movie Juno.
Here are some other similar searches from Google Suggest.
Nurses are:
nurses are great
nurses are angels
nurses are mean
nurses are heroes
Medicine is:
medicine is keystone of the arch of socialism
medicine is working but u.s. economy isn't healthy yet
medicine is an art
medicine is not candy
Hospitals are:
hosptials are generally categorized as nonprofit for-profit or governmental
hospitals are cold
hospitals are challenged by competition for paying patients
The study's aim was to better understand how physicians use the internet in their clinical practices. As you'd expect from a study sponsored by Google, it was particularly focused on how physicians use search.
The study surveyed 411 physicians from a range of specialties (PCPs, endocrinologist, cardiologists, psychiatrist) and with a range of experience (2 - 30 years in practice) on their use of the internet in clinical practice. Additionally, various clinical scenarios were presented designed to mimic actual situations the physicians might encounter.
Here are some of the findings. All these percentages seem low to me.
86% of physicians have used the internet to gather health, medical, or prescription drug information.
Only 21% of physicians who use the internet in their clinical setting access the internet for medical information in the patient exam room.
58% of physicians access the internet more than once daily.
Only 81% of physicians use search engines. Of these, 92% use Google (naturally), but only 13% use Google Scholar. (I'm not certain where Pubmed fits into this — I presume it falls under "search engine.")
Physicians most commonly searched online for general condition information and specific drug information.
As a result of online research, physicians made a change in medication or initiated a treatment about 30% of the the time.
78% (only 78%?!) believe the Internet has made practicing medicine easier.
8% of all physicians clicked sponsored links, but21% of psychiatrists clicked on sponsored links. (Analyze that.)
92% of physicians clicked on the first search result.
To delve further into the summary PDF, click here.
The Healthline Site, its content, such as text, graphics, images, search
results, HealthMaps, Trust Marks, and other material contained on the
Healthline Site ("Content"), its services, and any information or material
posted on the Healthline Site by third parties are provided for informational
purposes only. None of the foregoing is a substitute for professional medical
advice, examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a
physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may
have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice
or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Healthline
Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911
immediately. Please read the Terms of Service for more information regarding
use of the Healthline Site.