The IVF Dilemma: Optimizing Pregnancy Rates, Minimizing Multiples
Friday, October 20, 2006
Carl M. Herbert, MD
One of the challenges in reproductive medicine is giving patients the best chance of conceiving while avoiding multiple births. After all, it is our experience that singleton births are the healthiest for both baby and mother. However, with an IVF cycle, fertility clinics typically transfer multiple embryos to give patients the greatest chance of conceiving…a practice that can result in multiple births. (This is quite different than natural fertilization wherein one embryo is fertilized during a natural cycle.) Thankfully, fertility clinics are making use of state-of-the-art techniques such as embryo freezing and the day 5 embryo transfer to help address this dilemma. With regard to embryo freezing, patients can avoid multiple pregnancies by transferring fewer fresh embryos and successfully freezing the remaining embryos. The frozen embryos can be thawed and transferred at a later date should the patient choose to have another IVF cycle.
Additionally, performing the day 5 embryo transfer as opposed to the standard day 3 embryo transfer enables us to assess which are the most chromosomally normal embryos as well as those most likely to develop in the womb following embryo transfer. Subsequently, fewer embryos are transferred (minimizing multiples). We are also seeing a small but growing number of couples interested in the day 5 transfer of only one embryo because they wish to avoid the risks of having a twin pregnancy. In fact, there is a recent article on use of single embryo transfer to help reduce multiple births. The article can be read
here. These procedures are not appropriate for all patients and we encourage you to speak to your physician or drop me a line to discuss your individual case.
Permalink |
Email Post
The Healthline Site, its content, such as text, graphics, images, search
results, HealthMaps, Trust Marks, and other material contained on the
Healthline Site ("Content"), its services, and any information or material
posted on the Healthline Site by third parties are provided for informational
purposes only. None of the foregoing is a substitute for professional medical
advice, examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a
physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may
have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice
or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Healthline
Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911
immediately. Please read the Terms of Service for more information regarding
use of the Healthline Site.
1 Comments:
At Sun Nov 11, 12:59:00 AM 2007,
RAE said…
DR HERBERT, MY NAME IS RAE AND I AM 35 YEARS OLD. I HAD A TUBAL LIGATION DONE AFTER MY LAST CHILD APPROXIMATELY 12 YEARS AGO. I AM NOW ENGAGED TO BE MARRIED AND MY FIANCEE AND I ARE WANTING TO HAVE ANOTHER BABY. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY INFO ABOUT A NEW PROCEDURE I HAVE READ ABOUT ONLINE CALLED A LOW TUBAL OVUM TRANSFER. BASICALLY, A WOMAN IS STIMULATED AND RETRIEVAL DONE LIKE IVF BUT OVUM ARE PUT BACK ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TUBAL BLOCKAGE CLOSE TO THE OPENING OF THE UTERUS AND THEN THE COUPLE HAVE NORMAL INTERCOURSE TO ACHIEVE PREGNANCY. I WAS LOOKING INTO A REVERSAL BUT DO NOT WANT THE MAJOR SURGERY AS I HAD TO HAVE A MYOMECTOMY LAST YEAR. I CANNOT AFFORD SEVERAL FULL IVF CYCLES AND MY FIANCEE IS TRULY PUT OFF BY THE IVF PROCESS AND FEELS IT IS TOO CLINICAL. I HAVE NOT SEEN MUCH ABOUT THIS OPTION AND JUST WONDERING ABOUT A DOCTORS TAKE ON THIS. I HAVE NO OTHER INFERTILITY ISSUES AND HAD NEVER HAD A PROBLEM CONCIEVING PRIOR. THANKS.
Post a Comment
<< Home