YOU Say: Genital Integrity Rules!
Sunday, April 15, 2007
JC Jones MA RN

My previous post,
WHO says: Male Circumcision Should be Part of HIV Prevention, reporting the World Health Organization's (not my own!) recommendations that male circumcision be part of a comprehensive plan to help prevent HIV transmission hit a nerve. Sixty percent of males are not circumcised and many insist the practice is barbaric and nothing short of mutilation. The
International Coalition for Genital Integrity (ICGI) exists to protect the rights of all humans to have the genitalia they were born with: males, females or intersexed. The Genital Integrity Movement "opposes medically unnecessary genital modification including male and female circumcision."
In 1949 pediatrician Dr. Douglas Gairdner published
The Fate of the Foreskin in the British Medical Journal. He concluded then there was little medical value to performing the operation. The foreskin of the penis is rich in nerve endings, and studies show that male circumcision
decreases sexual sensitivity and pleasure in males and their partners (of either sex).
Nobel Laureates Dr. Crick and Jonas Salk signed the
Ashley Montague Resolution to End the Genital Mutilation of Children Worldwide A Petition to the World Court The Hague. Ok, scientists at WHO, now what do you recommend?
Image courtesy of Genital Integrity: Genital Integrity. © 1998 NOHARMM
Permalink |
Email Post
The Healthline Site, its content, such as text, graphics, images, search
results, HealthMaps, Trust Marks, and other material contained on the
Healthline Site ("Content"), its services, and any information or material
posted on the Healthline Site by third parties are provided for informational
purposes only. None of the foregoing is a substitute for professional medical
advice, examination, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a
physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may
have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice
or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on the Healthline
Site. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your doctor or 911
immediately. Please read the Terms of Service for more information regarding
use of the Healthline Site.
2 Comments:
At Fri Apr 20, 10:06:00 AM 2007,
Anonymous said…
Oh, yes. Let's not risk that possible decrease in sexual sensitivity for the silly benefit of sparing a human life or two (or a million) from the ravages of HIV disease.
Get a grip!
At Thu May 31, 02:39:00 PM 2007,
S.S. said…
reply to anonymous
those studies are new and have already had issues raised with them over whether the use of condoms was the reason
even if circumcision does reduce the risk it is still far too little protection, a condom is almost 100% safe which is far more then we could ever hope circumcision to help
instead of spending all this time and money on something barbaric like cutting penises lets just provide condoms and do something that will actually help
Post a Comment
<< Home